Untitled Document
Home | About Us | Contact
21 Nov 2017
10:36 PM
Go Social :
Untitled Document
     Authors Desk
Detail of This Paper

Year 2013
Authors Biswaranjan Rout , Dr.Rati Ranjan Das
Broad area Mechanical Engineering

 In this work parameters which are likely to affect the posture of the operator while working with workstation and desktop computer (DTC) is investigated. The basic objective is for adjustments of parameters to obtain ergonomic work posture during DTC operation. Considered adjustments are (1) foot rest height, (2) seat support height, (3) DTC base support height, (4) distance between the user’s body and DTC (or user-DTC distance), (5) screen angle. Two algorithms are developed. The algorithms are tested using eight consented volunteers by taking photographs of the lateral postures while working. The effectiveness of ergonomic intervention is verified both visually and objectively.

 [1 ] Ghanekar,M ;Wang.D.D.L;Heppler,G.R. (1999) Sealing laws for the dynamics and control of flexible manipulator Robotics and automation page 427-434
[2 ] Heideri,A;Nikoobin,A; (Robio 2007) Maximum allowable dynamic load of flexible manipulators with imposing residual vibration constraint Robotics and biometrics page 1457-1462
[3 ]Horikawa, M (2001) Effect of visual display terminal height on the trapezius muscle hardness: quantitative evaluation by a newly developed muscle hardness meter. Appl. Ergon., 32: 473-478.
[4 ]Jalil, S and Nanthavanij, S (2007) Analytical algorithms for ergonomic seated posture when working with notebook computers Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., 6: 146-157.
[5 ]Jamjumrus, N and Nanthavanij, S (2007) Ergonomic intervention for improving work posture during notebook computer operation. Working Paper No. MT-0704, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University.
[6]Nanthavanij, S (1996a) A comparison of VDT workstation adjustment methods by evaluating and optimizing VDT operator’s seated posture. Int. J. Occup. Safety Ergon., 2: 284-293.
[7] Nanthavanij, S (1996b) Body height – workstation settings matrix: a practical tool for ergonomic VDT workstation adjustment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 18: 215-219.
[8] Nanthavanij, S and Venezia, DW (1999) Estimation of recommended VDT workstation settings from operator’s body height and gender. Ind. Eng. Res., 1: 90-103.
[9 ]Rurkhamet, B and Nanthavanij, S (2004a) Analytical design methodology for recommending VDT workstation settings and computer accessories layout. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., 3: 149-159.
[10 ]Rurkhamet, B and Nanthavanij, S (2004b) Analytic and rule-based decision support tool for VDT workstation adjustmentand computer accessories arrangement. J. Hum. Ergol., 33: 1-17.
[11] Sommerick, CM, Starr, H, Smith, CA and Shivers, C (2002) Effects of notebook computer configuration and task on user biomechanics, productivity, and comfort. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 30: 7-31. [12 ]Straker, L, Jones, KJ and Miler, J (1997a) A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Appl. Ergon., 28: 263-268. [13 ]Straker, L, Pollock, CM and Mangharam, JE (1997b) The effect of shoulder posture on performance, discomfort and musclefatigue whilst working on a visual display unit. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 20: 1-10.

[14] Szeto, GP and Lee, R (2002) An ergonomic evaluation of desktop, notebook and subnotebook computers. Arch. Phys. Med.Rehab., 83: 527-532. [15 ]The Human Factors Society (1988) American National Standard for Human Factors Engineering of Visual Display Terminal Workstations (ANSI/HFS 100-1988). Santa Monica, USA.


Untitled Document
Copyright ©2017 PICCO Engineering, Cuttack